Share the workflow brief.
Two working days ahead, a short brief: the workflow, its handoffs, and the outcome that matters.
Workflow Review
A fixed-fee, 45-minute review for document-heavy teams. We map one painful workflow, find where work breaks, and recommend the first fix worth building.
How it runs
Scellus brings the workflow map. Your team brings the bottlenecks. The session stays remote, bounded, and focused on one workflow only.
Two working days ahead, a short brief: the workflow, its handoffs, and the outcome that matters.
Forty-five minutes on Google Meet, one workflow. Bring the owner and one person who sees where it stalls.
Within three working days, a written note: the workflow map, top three fixes, and a recommended block stack.
What we look for
These patterns surface first in a review. Most teams recognise three or four immediately. We name them precisely, then rank what to fix first.
The same steps repeated each day by the people who could be doing higher-judgement work.
Decisions that wait on one person, with no surfaced queue and no audit of what is stuck.
Files re-keyed, re-named, re-attached, and re-checked because no version is trusted.
The same client, claim, or order typed into three places because nothing connects.
Items that go quiet because no system holds the ageing or owns the chase.
Critical sheets that one person built, understands, and keeps alive.
Verification done by eye, with errors caught at submission rather than at the source.
Tools that should talk to each other but instead leave staff copying numbers between tabs.
What you receive
You can use it with your IT team, your accountant, another vendor, or keep it as an internal decision note. Workflow Review is the entry point to a workflow build with Scellus, not a gate that locks you in.
A simple workflow map showing the inputs, handoffs, approvals, outputs, and systems involved in one selected process.
The main breakpoints, where time or accuracy is being lost, and the top three fixes ranked by impact and effort.
A recommended first block stack, a build-now or wait recommendation, and the next step Scellus would take with your team.
Fee and next step
Workflow Review answers one question: is the workflow worth building with an operating-grade system, and what should be built first?
Workflow Review
RM 1,999
Fixed fee for one selected workflow, a remote session, and a written review note within three working days.
If implementation starts within 60 days, the review fee is credited in full.
Workflow Build
Scoped after the review
If the review shows the workflow is worth building, Scellus quotes a fixed scope, builds it, and operates it with you. Pricing depends on the review.
Quote
Scellus writes a fixed scope, fee, and timeline from the review note for your team to approve.
Build
We assemble blocks into your workflow stack, integrated with the systems you already use.
Operate
Scellus runs the workflow on a monthly retainer, handles exceptions, and reports against the outcome.
The review identifies which of our standard blocks the workflow needs. See how the blocks fit together →
Who this is for
Three examples of workflows we can review. The pattern is repeated documents, checks, approvals, exceptions, and exports.
Repeating processes are where the cost is clearest and the fix is fastest.
We need one person in the room who can say exactly where it breaks.
Document-heavy steps are where structure creates the fastest return.
If it fails the same way each cycle, we can map it and fix it.
This review goes deep on one workflow, not your whole operation.
With too many owners, the 45-minute session runs too shallow.
We review operational workflows, not standalone digital ideas.
The workflow needs enough repetition to justify improving it.
Common questions
Clear answers to help you decide whether a Workflow Review is the right starting point.
Book Workflow Review
We reply within one working day with available windows, payment details, and any fit questions before the session is confirmed.
Workflow Review is RM 1,999. Payment is arranged after we confirm the workflow is suitable for a bounded review.